31 Sizzling CRM Statistics to Help Your Business Soar

31 Sizzling CRM Statistics to Help Your Business Soar
ByDamjan Jugovic Spajic
June 11,2021

Yet another day at the office. It’s already 1 pm and you still haven’t finished entering all your customers’ data into that confounded Excel table. You’re drowning in sales quotas and you can feel the judgmental looks your managers are throwing your way, as if this whole mess is your fault.

Thankfully, technology is making sure situations like these will soon become a thing of the past. You can now schedule employees’ shifts online and organize contracts in a matter of minutes using enterprise contract management tools. Similarly, the development of CRM (customer relationship management) systems has made managing customer data, communicating with other teams, and creating effective sales strategies much easier. Unfortunately, implementing CRM systems does not always lead to success stories. 

Check out our CRM statistics below to improve your business and avoid the stress of managing your customer data manually.

CRM Statistics - Editor’s Choice

  • In 2008, 12% of the businesses that used CRM used a cloud-based CRM system. By 2017, that figure had increased to 87%.
  • CRM revenues are expected to reach over $80 billion in 2025.
  • Only 22% of companies using non-mobile CRM have met their sales quotas compared to 65% of those that do use mobile CRM systems.
  • Companies that use CRM successfully have improved sales by 29%.

CRM Market Size Statistics

The size of the global CRM market was around $48.2 billion in 2018.


According to data from Gartner’s CRM market analysis, the market value of this software was $48.2 billion in 2018. This is a huge jump from the $14 billion of revenue this market had in 2010. Most CRM stats indicate that this trend will continue, especially because more and more companies are racing to implement CRM in order to stay competitive as well as to save time and money.

The global CRM market grew by 15.6% in 2018.


Gartner’s CRM research on the state of the market shows that the global revenue of the CRM market grew by 15.6% in 2018. Around 72.9% of total CRM spending was on SaaS (Software as a Service). SaaS refers to a method of software delivery in which a software is accessed online, rather than being installed on individual computers. SaaS is expected to grow to 75% of total CRM spending during 2019.

91% of US businesses with more than 10 employees now use CRM.

(CRM Magazine)

As CRM Magazine reports, the overwhelming majority of American businesses that employ 10 or more people now use CRM. This is a good signifier that CRM is now becoming a must-have for all medium-size or large companies, as it can greatly reduce costs and improve efficiency.

Predictions suggest that the social CRM market will grow to $10 billion in value in 2019.

(Thomson Data)

Social CRM statistics provided by Thomson Data reveal that the social CRM market is predicted to reach $10 billion in size this year. Social CRM represents an integration between CRM and social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter in order to improve businesses’ communication with customers and anticipate their needs.

In 2008, 12% of the businesses that used CRM used a cloud-based CRM system. By 2017, that figure had increased to 87%.


The next step in CRM evolution is certainly cloud-based systems. IBM reports that in 2008 most businesses that used CRM systems - 88% of them - operated these systems on-site. Now, almost all of these services are being transferred to the cloud, which allows users to access them remotely. As a result, by 2017, 87% of companies that used CRM had transferred these systems to the cloud.

CRM Adoption Rate Statistics

In 2017, 25.3% of participants surveyed by CSO Insights agreed that their CRM system had significantly improved the productivity of their sales team.

(CSO Insights)

A study conducted by CSO Insights indicates that, in 2017, 25.3% of respondents agreed that their CRM system significantly boosted the productivity of their salespeople. Furthermore, 22.4% somewhat agreed with this statement, while 30.3% disagreed. Nearly 50% of these teams admitted their operations required major redesigns or improvements.

For 13% of companies, investing in a CRM system is the top sales priority for 2019.


HubSpot’s excellent State of the Inbound CRM report from 2018 showcases what companies marked as their top sales priorities for 2019. In the report, only 13% of these companies identified investing in a CRM as their top priority. This should come as no surprise since most companies prioritize closing more deals, but this data is still an indication that many companies don’t recognize CRM as a crucial asset yet.

65% of companies start using a CRM system in their first five years of business.


Data from 2015 provided by Capterra shows that over half of companies - 65%, to be precise - implement a CRM system within their first five years of doing business.

27% of sales professionals spend over an hour a day on data-entry work.


In any business, especially in sales, there’s one golden rule we should never forget: time is money. Bearing this in mind, HubSpot’s CRM statistics reveal that 27% of salespeople use over an hour of their office time every day on data entry, which emphasizes the need for a CRM. Since every minute they’re not selling is a potential loss of money, proper CRM implementation allows sales professionals to focus more on sales and generate more profit for their companies.

Sales reps spend only 17.9% of their time on CRM systems.


Forbes reports that sales representatives only use 17.9% of their work time working with CRM systems. Over half of that time (9.1%) is spent handling spreadsheets related to CRM management. In order for CRM to be used efficiently, more time should be devoted to its proper use. To put things into perspective, nearly two-thirds (64.8%) of sales reps’ time is spent on activities that do not generate revenue. This indicates that salespeople do have time that could be devoted to efficient CRM use.

Only 45.7% of companies reported an adoption rate above the desired 90% in 2018.

(CSO Insights)

Adoption rates for CRM are one of the main challenges in CRM implementation and one of the main reasons CRM projects fail. Without high adoption rates and training, these systems can become a hindrance instead of helping your business. In a 2018 study by CSO Insights, 45.7% of companies that used CRM had an adoption rate higher than 90%.

General CRM adoption has increased from 61.6% in 2013 to 67.8% in 2018.

(CSO Insights)

CRM adoption stats have generally increased, with the percentage of companies that have an adoption rate over 75% rising from 61.6% to 67.8% over a five-year period.

In 2016, 22% of sales professionals weren’t sure what CRM was.


HubSpot revealed a surprising and worrying fact in its 2016 State of Inbound report: Around 22% of surveyed sales professionals weren’t sure what CRM was. This is certainly a major obstacle on the already bumpy road to full CRM implementation.

For 54% of salespeople, the biggest obstacle to obtaining CRM software is its cost.


One of the main difficulties to obtaining CRM is the most obvious one: money. Current CRM vendor trends show that monthly pricing ranges from $30 to $100 per user, which can really strain company budgets.

45% of surveyed organizations used CRM to store customer data in 2016.


As per HubSpot’s 2016 research, only 45% of respondents said their organization used CRM to store customer and lead data. This is a significant jump from 2015, when 23% of organizations used CRM for data storage. Unfortunately, as CRM usage for data grew, so did reliance on “traditional” tools such as Microsoft Excel. The use of informal tools for data storage rose from 24% to 40% in the same time period.

A third of CRM users spent between three and five hours weekly using CRM tools.


LinkedIn’s State of Sales report on CRM trends from 2016 also provides useful data on the amount of time CRM users devote to these tools on a weekly basis. One-third of CRM users spend from three to five hours per week using CRM, while 24% spend more than 10 hours per week.

In 2015, 80% of respondents claim they implemented their CRM in 18 months or less.


The time required to properly implement CRM systems can vary greatly. Considering that it can, in some cases, take years to fully implement, it’s often the difference between success and total disaster. Capterra’s user research from 2015 shows that things were not that grim after all - most respondents said they took 18 months or less to implement their CRM.

Statistics on CRM Effectiveness

Companies that use CRM successfully have improved their sales by 29%.


Data on the effectiveness of CRM tools can be hard to find. This is because there are many measurable factors that cause these tools to either fail or succeed. The latest and most trustworthy data comes from Salesforce, a major player in the CRM market. In 2013, it was reported that properly using CRM can greatly improve business effectiveness. Salesforce stats show that successful CRM implementation can boost sales by 29%, increase sales productivity by 34%, and sharpen sales forecast accuracy by 42%.

The CRM failure rate was between 18% and 69% in 2017.


Another difficult statistic to pinpoint is the rate at which CRM projects fail. Several studies conducted over the past two decades provide wildly different results as a consequence of different methodologies and terminologies used in research. As a result, different researchers put the failure rate of CRM between 18% and 69%. If we take the average results of these reports, we end up with a failure rate of around 30% for CRM projects.

By using CRM, customer retention and satisfaction rates increase by 47%.


Surely some of the key stats in demonstrating the importance of CRM when running a sales business are customer satisfaction and retention. Customer retention - the company’s ability to keep its customers and inspire brand loyalty - is crucial when evaluating the effectiveness of your CRM. Capterra reports that CRM software boosts both retention and satisfaction rates by 47%. These impressive stats are sure to encourage further growth of the CRM market.

Conversion rates can rise by up to 300% using CRM.


Converting leads or potential customers into buyers is the bread and butter of any sales business. That’s why everyone is wondering “Will CRM improve my conversion rates?”. The stats we have say yes - proper CRM implementation can lead to an increase in conversion rates of up to 300%.

Customers spend between 20% and 40% more if they’re engaged by a company using CRM, 2017 data shows.


As research conducted by Cloudswave suggests, using CRM in sales can increase the amount of purchases customers make with your company. When a company that uses CRM engages a customer, they are likely to spend 20-40% more on their next purchase with the same company.

2014 data indicates that the ROI for CRM is $8.71 per $1 spent.

(Nucleus Research)

The stats provided by Nucleus Research concerning ROI (return on investment) suggest that investing in CRM will pay off. For every $1 you spend, you make $8.71 back. That is if the CRM is correctly implemented, of course. This translates into an impressive 771% ROI.

34.6% of sales professionals say that CRM tools have a significant impact on their company’s bottom line.


Among those surveyed in LinkedIn’s 2016 State of Sales report, approximately a third of respondents said that using CRM tools was important for their business. Another 29.6% described their usage of CRM tools as impactful.

Only 22% of companies using non-mobile CRM meet their sales quotas compared to 65% of those that use mobile CRM systems.


Mobile CRM leads the way. Just as cloud-based CRM is gaining momentum, the need for flexibility and ease of access has led to the increased popularity of mobile CRM, which refers to CRM tools you can access from your phone, tablet, or other devices. Not only is mobile CRM popular, it’s also effective. Research by InnoPpl shows that 65% of companies that use mobile CRM meet their quotas, compared to 22% of those that use non-mobile versions. Switching to mobile and cloud-based systems is the new CRM trend.

Customer satisfaction will become the most important factor in business by 2020.


A report on the future of sales published by Walker predicts that customer satisfaction will become a key differentiator as soon as next year. According to the report, customer satisfaction will surpass price and quality in terms of importance by 2020. Results from this report point out that 86% of customers are willing to pay 25% more for a better customer experience.

State of the CRM Market

Salesforce is the undisputed king of the industry with over 19% of the CRM market share.


Salesforce is, without a doubt, the biggest player in the CRM market. As Forbes reports, Salesforce now has over 19% of the market. It boasts more than twice as many sales as SAP, the second-largest CRM company, and three times more than Oracle in third place.

Salesforce and Adobe grew faster than the overall CRM market in 2017.


Research conducted by Garner on the state of the market reveals that Salesforce and Adobe’s growth was larger than that of the total CRM market in 2017. Salesforce grew by 23.2%, increasing its revenues from $7.6 billion in 2017 to $9.4 billion in 2018. Meanwhile, Adobe grew by 21.7%, with a revenue increase from $2 billion to $2.4 billion in the same period.

Salesforce has announced that’s it’s aiming for $60 billion in revenue by 2034.

(Seeking Alpha)

Here’s another stat about Salesforce, the market leader in CRM tool development and sales. In 2018, Salesforce’s CEO announced that the company was planning on reaching $20 billion in revenues by 2020, $40 billion by 2028, and $60 billion by 2034. To achieve this, Salesforce would have to grow by 12% annually for 16 years in a row.

Global CRM revenues are expected to reach over $80 billion in 2025.

(Grand View Research)

The global CRM market has shown remarkable growth and overall development in recent years. If CRM trends continue and the market keeps growing at the same pace, its worth will reach $81.9 billion by 2025.

Eastern and Western Europe are the fastest-growing regions in the global CRM market.


CRM statistics from 2019 show that, at a regional level, the fastest-growing parts of the world are Eastern and Western Europe. Eastern Europe has a 19.7% growth rate, Western Europe is at 17.5%, while North America has a growth rate of 15.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions
What does a CRM do?

CRM (customer relationship management) is a system that manages and compiles all customer data in one place. It also streamlines inter-team communication in order to boost productivity and sales.

What is CRM adoption?

The CRM adoption rate represents the percentage of individual users or companies that use CRM compared to the total amount of user slots bought. Increasing the adoption rate is vital for the CRM industry.

How big is the CRM industry?

The CRM market was worth $36.5 billion in 2017. In 2018 it became the largest software industry, and it’s expected to reach $80 billion by 2020.

How can CRM improve sales?

CRM systems boost sales by centralizing and gathering all customer-related data in one place. CRM software is useful because it makes reaching and retaining customers easier and cuts production costs, increasing companies’ revenues.

What companies use CRM software?

Some of the biggest companies that use CRM are Coca Cola, Tesco, Apple, McDonalds, KFC, and Lufthansa. Nowadays, for most companies that work with a huge number of customers, CRM is a must.

What is the average CRM user adoption rate across all industries?

User adoption statistics indicate that the general CRM adoption rate was 67.8% in 2018, an increase from 61.3% reported in 2013.

What is ROI in CRM?

The ROI (return on investment) rate for CRMs is $8.71 per $1 spent – a 771% ROI – CRM statistics show.

How do I increase CRM in user adoption?

The key to increasing CRM user adoption is implementing CRM systems that are easier to use and providing sufficient training for employees. Untrained employees and over-complicated CRM systems are among the main CRM adoption challenges.

About author

Damjan won’t tell you how to run your business, but he will try to advise you on how to save your money and avoid financial ruin. As a staff writer at SmallBizGenius, he focuses on finding the most consumer-friendly services available and provides advice to both established and fledgling businesses out there.

More from blog

Victimless crimes without bloody traces, fingerprints, or mysteries worthy of Hercule Poirots’ insights and findings don’t shake the public too much. People don’t usually expect white-collar office workers with their noses buried into piles of papers to keep dark secrets. Despite that, white-collar crime statistics show the seriousness of this problem, which can have devastating consequences on businesses and enterprises.  Money laundering, embezzlement, financial statement frauds, check or payment tampering are among the most common crimes committed by white-collar workers. We compiled data regarding those felonies to help you learn more about white-collar corporate crimes.  White-Collar Crime Stats: Editor’s Choice Only 28% of white-collar employees involved in corporate crimes are women. A typical white-collar felon is a married male in his forties.   White-collar crimes cost the United States over $300 billion per year. Only 6.1% of corporate criminals come from an unhealthy family background. Only 9% of frauds happen in nonprofit organizations. Corruption accounts for 43% of white-collar crimes and causes a median loss of $200,000 per case.  The maximum prison sentence for insider trading in the US is 20 years. White-Collar Crime Demographics: Who Commits the Crimes? Only 28% of white-collar employees involved in corporate crimes are women. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) If there has ever been a need to draw a forensic sketch of a typical corporate criminal for identification purposes, it very likely wouldn’t be a woman. Detailed research into the demographics of white-collar criminals showed that women are very rare corporate crime offenders, accounting for only 27% of committed frauds. The fact that a vast majority are men is understandable given the disproportion of females in higher management positions at corporations. Corporate crime statistics reveal that a typical white-collar felon is a married male in his forties. (Bajoka) (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) The typical white-collar criminal doesn’t look any different than the co-workers you sip your morning coffee with. He is likely in his mid-forties, though some start earlier. He doesn’t have a criminal record and hasn’t committed any criminal acts until his late 30s. Most of them boast at least a Bachelor’s degree and belong to the professions not so often associated with illegal activities: lawyers, financial advisors, accountants, and clergy members. Some companies use employee tracking software to get a better insight into their workforce, but these felons are usually in positions of power, where they don’t get tracked or at least know how to circumvent it.  Statistics of white-collar crime in the US show 35.3% of felons have more than $10,000 in assets. (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) As we can see from the statistics gathered in the research commissioned by The University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice, over a third of white-collar criminals are well-established in the society, with more than $10,000 in assets. 63.5% have residential stability, and out of that number, 50.3% are homeowners. They are usually highly ranked in their companies, often at managerial positions, and 65.8% of them have steady employment.  White-collar crime racial statistics reveal 73.9% of offenders are white. (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) Social and other prejudices often take over the minds of people when they think of criminal activities. Corporate crime is a different beast, though.  Nearly three-quarters of white-collar offenders are white people coming from middle-class or better backgrounds. Notably, income tax frauds are overwhelmingly white-male driven crimes, with 91.4% of perpetrators being male and 89.1% white. Only 6.1% of corporate criminals come from an unhealthy family background. (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) When we speak or think about thefts, kidnapping, rape, or murders, we often envision the perpetrators coming from tough financial conditions and unhealthy family backgrounds. Statistics on white-collar crime indicate some often overlooked facts regarding the families the felons come from. Namely, only 6.1% of them were raised in families where they were abused, neglected, or abandoned as children. Only 6% grew up with at least one family member involved in criminal activities, and 15% had parents who struggled to provide the necessities of life. Common Types of White-Collar Crimes Asset misappropriation schemes account for 86% of frauds and cause a median loss of $100,000 per case. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Now that we know who commits white-collar crimes and the statistics behind them, we can determine the most common types of these crimes. According to the data gathered in the Report to the Nations global study on occupational fraud and abuse, the most frequent fraud scheme is asset misappropriation. This felony accounts for 86% of all white-collar crimes, but, luckily, it’s the least costly type with a median loss of $100,000 per case. Asset misappropriation happens when an employee misuses or steals the company’s resources and thus defrauds their employers.  Financial statement frauds are the most costly type of white-collar crime, with a median loss of $954,000. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Luckily, white-collar crime statistics indicate that financial statement fraud schemes are the least common type of corporate fraud, accounting for only 10% of the cases. So what are financial statement frauds? They involve schemes in which the offender intentionally omits or misstatements the material in the company’s financial statements. Corruption accounts for 43% of cases and causes a median loss of $200,000 per case. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Corruption takes up an expectedly high proportion of occupational frauds. Offenses such as bribery, extortion, conflicts of interest, bid-rigging, and other illegal activities cause losses of around $200,000 per case. One of the more alarming facts about white-collar crime is that corruption cases often cost companies more than just money. Often their reputation goes on the line, and many have to reach out to costly reputation management services to mitigate the damage. 64% of organizational offenses in the United States happen in closely-held or private corporations. (United States Sentencing Committee) Speaking of the structure of the organizations where frauds are committed, 64% of them are private or closely-held corporations. US white-collar crime statistics show that limited liability companies account for 22.7% of cases, and 9.3% of cases happen in publicly traded corporations. If we dig deeper into the infrastructure of American businesses committing corporate offenses, we can conclude that most are small in size. Namely, 66.1% had fewer than 50 employees, and only 9.7% had more than 1,000.  Only 9% of frauds happen in nonprofit organizations. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Although nonprofit organizations reported very low white-collar crime rates, the $75,000 in damages per case can be a serious blow to smaller organizations. According to the 2020 Report to the Nations study, private organizations accounted for 44% of corporate frauds, public ones for 26%, government agencies for 16%, and other company types for 6%. General White-Collar Crime Statistics FBI white-collar crime statistics show that these criminal offenses cost the US over $300 billion per year. (Cornell Law School 2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), corporate crime offenses are estimated to cost the US more than $300 billion every year. Aside from fines, other penalties for white-collar crimes include paying the cost of prosecution, home detention, forfeitures, community confinement, supervised release, and even imprisonment.  Only 56% of organizations conducted an investigation of their worst corporate criminal incident. (PwC's Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2020) When we look at white-collar crime report statistics, we can see that the main reason for the persistent recurrence of corporate crime might be the lack of people willing to report it. Figures show that only 56% of businesses conducted an investigation of their worst incidents related to white-collar crime. Simultaneously, barely one-third of organizations reported the incident to the board. 89% of the interviewees reported negative emotions after an incident or fraud happened at the company. Taking all the necessary steps to address and better understand the issue results in fewer fraud cases in the future. Ignoring white-collar crime sentencing statistics for a moment, nearly 60% of companies who conducted detailed investigations into the fraud cases ended up being better off for it.  80% of white-collar crime perpetrators received some punishment in 2020, but only 59% of the cases were referred to law enforcement agents. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Organizations can refer to the corporate criminal incident internally, through civil litigation, or by reaching out to law enforcement. The statistics on the response to frauds indicate that nearly half of the victim organizations (46%) never refer these frauds to law enforcement, believing that internal discipline is sufficient. Another big reason for refraining from reaching out to the criminal justice system is the fear of bad publicity (32%). There were 755 cases of money laundering in the United States in 2020. (United States Sentencing Committee) White-collar crime statistics by the state indicate that the Southern District of Florida had the highest number of money laundering cases during the fiscal year of 2020 (42). This was followed by the Southern Districts of New York and Texas, with 33 convictions each. One of the ways to prevent money laundering and tax evasion is to engage professional tax software solutions to help companies stay up-to-date and compliant with state and federal tax laws. White-collar crime prison statistics reveal that the maximum prison sentence for insider trading in the United States is 20 years. (US Securities and Exchange Commission) Even though not many people and organizations are willing to go to law enforcement in resolving corporate fraud cases, there are exceptions. When reaching out to the criminal justice system to solve the problem, victim organizations can expect the maximum prison sentence for insider trading to be 20 years. At the same time, the maximum amount of money charged from corporate criminals is $5 million for individuals and $25 million for organizations. Obviously, insider trading is just one of the many corporate frauds that can ruin a company’s finances and reputation, but the steep punishments should serve to encourage more people to speak up and get the felons convicted.
By Danica Djokic · October 07,2021
Diversity and inclusion are some of the most important policies that can not only improve the working environment and enhance employee engagement but significantly contribute to all other aspects of any business. The benefits are numerous, and we will discuss them as we unveil some of the most interesting diversity in the workplace statistics. Being a diverse company means hiring people of different ethnicities, gender, age, religion, etc. Companies that have successfully implemented D&I initiatives are often seen as more desirable for employees due to their broader perspective and the positive attitude they cherish. We have done our research, and these are some of the reasons everyone should embrace diversity. Editor’s Choice of Diversity in the Workplace Statistics In 2019, millennials accounted for 35% of the US labor force. Only 8% of CEOs at Fortune 500 companies are female. Diverse companies are 70% more likely to acquire new markets. 46% of Hispanic and 39% of black women earn less than $15 an hour. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fathers who worked remotely were promoted three times more than women in the same position. General Workplace Diversity Data and Stats In 2020, only 17.9% of persons with disabilities were employed in the US. (US Bureau of Labor Statistics) Based on the report published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2020, the unemployment rate for persons with disabilities grew compared to the previous year. In 2019, the percentage of employed persons with disabilities in the US was 19.3. However, those numbers dropped to 17.9 the following year.  Regarding people without disabilities, the report stated 66.3% of them were employed during 2019, but the numbers decreased to 61.8% in 2020. These rates show that there is still much work to be done to overcome the lack of diversity in the workplace, and statistics will need to include more people with disabilities in the workforce going forward. By 2024, it’s expected that 24.8% of the US workforce will be employees older than 55. (Deloitte) It’s not a secret that the US workforce is aging each year. Research on shifting workforce demographics, conducted by Deloitte, suggests that by 2024 employees aged 55+ will make up 24.8% of the workforce. This might not mean much to you, but it is a severe increase if we go back to 1994 when this percentage was significantly lower, or to be precise, 11.9%. The research also projects that the US workforce diversity statistics are about to change and, by 2024, less than two-thirds of the labor force will be defined as “white non-Hispanic.” Back in 1994, over 75% of the labor force fell into that category. In 2019, millennials accounted for 35% of the US labor force. (Pew Research Center) Millennials are all those born between 1981 and 1996, and back in 2019, they accounted for over a third of the US labor force. In 2016, the millennial generation surpassed Generation Xers and became the largest population in the US labor force.  According to research from 2019, Millennials are expected to comprise 75% of the global workforce by 2025.  Gender Diversity in the Workplace Statistics Only 8% of CEOs at Fortune 500 companies are female. (Statista) The gap between male and female leadership roles has always been a thing, and there are multiple statistics to confirm that. However, it looks like things are changing for the better. As Statista confirmed earlier this year, there’s been a new record when it comes to female CEOs. As of June 14, 2021, there were 41 female CEOs employed at Fortune 500 companies. According to the statistics, this wasn’t the only record that got broken. For the first time ever, two black women are running America's 500 highest-grossing companies, giving us hope that gender diversity on executive boards might become a reality in the not-so-distant future. In terms of the median salary in the US, women earn around 18% less than men. (PayScale) The gap between the leadership roles isn’t the only hurdle that women are facing in business nowadays. PayScale, a company that helps employers and employees understand the appropriate pay for every position, reviewed these issues in its Gender Pay Gap Report for 2021. According to this report, women earn only $0.82 for every dollar a man makes. Although it might sound discouraging, this is a slight improvement compared to 2020, when they earned one cent less, as per employment diversity statistics. Also, bear in mind these are uncontrolled pay gap statistics - when doing the same job with the same qualifications, the numbers are less dire: women earn 98 cents for every dollar a man does. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fathers who worked remotely were promoted three times more than women in the same position. (CNBC) The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of the business as we know it. Many had to adapt to the new reality and switch to their home offices instead. According to a CNBC report, 34% of men with children working from home received some kind of promotion during this period.  On the other hand, women’s jobs have been hit much harder by the pandemic. According to an analysis conducted by the National Women’s Law Center, of the 1.1 million workers ages 20 and over, who left the labor force between August and September of 2020, 865,000 were women. Racial and Cultural Diversity in the Workplace Statistics 46% of Hispanic and 39% of black women earn less than $15 an hour. (The Washington Post) In 2019, around 39 million people earned less than $15 per hour. These 39 million employees made about 28% of the workforce at the time, and the majority of the low-wage category consisted of Hispanic and black women. In fact, they were more than 2x as likely as white men to fall into this wage category.  Based on the Washington Post’s research on diversity in the workplace, statistics haven’t really changed since 2019. Roughly 46% of Hispanic women and 39% of Black women still make less than $15 an hour. On the other hand, only 18% of White and Asian men hover around this wage bracket. More than 90% of all Google employees are white or Asian men. (Statista) According to Statista, the distribution of Google employees in the US from 2014 to 2021 does not look very racially or gender-diverse. The data for 2021 shows that white men account for 50.4% of employees, with Asian men following with 42.3%. On the flip side, only 4.4% of the employees are black men and women. If you look at the timeline of these statistics on diversity in the workplace, you will see the Asian population is experiencing steady growth, while the white population dropped from 64.5% in 2014 to 50.4% in 2021.  In 2019, black people held only 3.2% of senior leadership roles in large organizations in the US. (Coqual) “Being Black in Corporate America” is the name of Coqual’s intersectional exploration aimed to show if and how things have changed for the black people in the US during the past few years. The research on the representation of black adults in the US has shown that only 3.2% of black people held senior leadership roles in major companies, with just 0.8% of them being Fortune 500 CEOs. Benefits of Diversity in the Workplace Statistics Diverse companies produce 19% more revenue than those with non-diverse leadership. (Forbes) A study by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), published in 2018, has found that diverse leadership increases the bottom line for companies. According to the study, increasing the diversity of leadership teams can lead to improved financial performance and better innovation. The study included 1,700 companies of all sizes across eight different countries. These findings are important as they show that diversity isn’t just an inclusion metric but an integral part of any successful business. In 2019, gender-diverse companies were 25% more likely to outperform their competitors. (McKinsey) Various diversity in the workplace stats show just how important diversity is and how it can help boost the overall performance of businesses of all sizes. Based on the findings from McKinsey’s research in 2019, companies with gender diversity have 25% higher chances to achieve higher profits than those with less gender diversity on the executive boards. Ethnic diversity in leadership teams is another vital factor. According to the report, companies implementing ethnic and cultural diversity on the executive level have a 36% likelihood of outperforming the competition.  Diverse companies are 70% more likely to acquire new markets. (Harvard Business Review) (Josh Bersin) Establishing a diverse workplace is vital for all modern organizations, and there are many diversity in the workplace statistics that prove this. Diverse companies also have 2.3 times higher cash flow per employee. They are also far better at capturing new markets when compared to the companies that do not practice diversity hiring.  80% of US job candidates look for inclusion when choosing an employer. (Deloitte) Salary and working hours aren't the only deciding factor when it comes to choosing a new employer. Back in 2017, Deloitte published a research paper that surveyed more than 1,300 full-time employees from a range of organizations all across the US. The paper showed just how important diversity and inclusion initiatives are by showing that four-fifths of all employees look for an inclusive workplace. 39% of respondents confirmed they would quit their current job if they found a more inclusive working environment, while 23% indicated they already left a job for that very reason.
By Nikolina Cveticanin · October 04,2021
Women account for 50.8% of the US population, hold 57% of all undergraduate degrees, and approximately 60% of all master’s degrees. And even though they hold about 52% of all management-level jobs, American women cannot keep pace with men in terms of representation when it comes to top leadership roles.  As male vs. female CEO statistics show, it’s the profit and loss roles or P&L responsibilities such as leading a brand, unit, or division, that set executives on the track to becoming a CEO. On the other hand, women who advance into C-suites - the “chief” jobs in companies - typically take on the roles such as head of human resources, legal, or administration. Although all of these functions are extremely important, the line of work they focus on doesn’t involve profit-generating responsibilities, which rarely makes them a path to running a company. Why does the percentage of CEOs that are female remain low in all parts of the world? There isn’t a simple answer to this question. Several studies have shown that it’s the fusion of work-life constraints, early professional trade-offs, and firmly established attitudes towards women in power and the skills and traits that make a good leader that can explain why the careers of equally ambitious and capable men and women often take such different turns. Let’s take a look at some of the most interesting findings. Male vs Female CEO Statistics - Editor’s Choice Female CEOs are running 41 Fortune 500 companies. There are two Black women among the Fortune 500 CEOs. Women made up only 5% of the CEOs appointed in 2020 globally. At the CEO level, men outnumber women by approximately 17 to one.  59% of male employees aspire to become CEOs versus 40% of women. 77% of women say the biggest obstacle to gender equity at the workplace is the lack of information on how to advance. Between 2015 and 2020, the share of women in senior vice president roles in the US increased from 23% to 28%. (McKinsey & Company) Over the same period, the percentage of women in the C-suite went up from 17% to 21%. All women, especially those of color, remained significantly outnumbered in senior management positions. However, prior to the start of the coronavirus pandemic, the representation of female workers in corporate America was slowly trending in the right direction.  According to 2020 statistics on female CEOs in the United States, 21% of C-suite members were women.  (McKinsey & Company)  Based on the survey results published by McKinsey & Company, there’s a leaky pipeline for women in leadership. In 2020, female workers accounted for 47% of entry-level positions, 38% of management roles, and 33% senior management/director roles. Women were entrusted with under one third (29%) of all vice president positions in American organizations. For every 100 men who got promoted to a managerial role, only 85 women advanced to the same position, based on the 2020 data.  (McKinsey & Company) This gap was even larger for women of color as only 71 Latinas, and 58 Black women received a promotion. Consequently, women remained underrepresented at the managerial level holding just 38% of manager positions, while men accounted for 62%. Male vs female CEO statistics from 2020 indicate that 39% of senior-level women burned out compared to 29% of men. (McKinsey & Company) Furthermore, 36% of women felt pressured to work more, in comparison with 27% of men. At the same time, 54% of C-suite women reported that they constantly felt exhausted, and so did 41% of men in similar positions. More than 50% of women in senior leadership roles promote gender and racial equality at work, in comparison with approximately 40% of male top executives. (McKinsey & Company) Women in leadership positions are more likely than men in senior-level roles to take a public stand on racial and gender diversity and champion the advancement of employee-friendly programs and policies. Women CEOs are also more likely to sponsor and mentor other female workers. According to the results of a recent survey, 38% of women in senior-level positions currently mentor or sponsor at least one woman of color, compared to only 23% of men in the same roles.   Female CEOs are running 41 Fortune 500 companies. (Fortune, Statista) In 2021, the number of women appointed to CEO positions in America's 500 highest-grossing companies reached an all-time high. However, the new record still only translates to approximately 8% of female representation at the top of the country's largest public businesses.  On the plus side, the number of women CEOs of Fortune 500 companies almost doubled in comparison with 2018 when there were 24 females leading the nation’s biggest businesses. Calls for diversity and inclusion in the highest echelons of America’s business world are starting to bear fruit as the number of female Fortune 500 chief executive officers increased for the third consecutive year. The top five biggest female-led Fortune 500 businesses as of August 2021 are CVS Health (rank four), Walgreens Boots Alliance (rank 16), General Motors (rank 22), Anthem (rank 23), and Citigroup (rank 33).  Speaking of women in leadership roles, statistics show that there are two Black women among the Fortune 500 CEOs. (Fortune) For the first time, two Black women are running Fortune 500 businesses - Roz Brewer of Walgreens Boots Alliance (rank 16) and Thasunda Brown Duckett of TIAA (rank 79). Before Duckett and Brewer started their new jobs in 2021, only one Black woman - Ursula Burns, former Xerox chief - had ever been appointed CEO at a Fortune 500 business on a permanent basis. After Burnes stepped down from the role in 2017, and, with the exception of Bed Bath & Beyond's Mary Winston, who worked as interim chief for a few months in 2019, Black female chief executive officers have been missing from the Fortune 500 list ever since. Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser is the first woman to run a major Wall Street bank. (Fortune) Fraser’s appointment marked huge progress for the financial industry. Much like Dick's Sporting Goods chief Lauren Hobart, Clorox chief Linda Rendle, new Coty CEO Sue Nabi, Walgreens Boots Alliance’s Roz Brewer, Thasunda Brown Duckett of TIAA, and CVS’s CEO Karen Lynch, Fraser took over from a male CEO. Statistics on Fortune 500 CEOs by gender reveal that there were only 37 female and 463 male chiefs leading America’s highest earning businesses in 2000. (Fortune) The number of women in CEO positions in the Fortune 500 hasn’t been growing steadily throughout the last two decades. There were 24 female chiefs in 2015, 21 women CEOs in 2016, and 32 women running Fortune 500 businesses in 2017, while that number dropped to 24 in 2018.  At the median, 16 female CEOs earned $13.6 million in 2020, in comparison to $12.6 million for the 326 men included in a study. (Equilar) According to a study published in May 2021 comparing a male CEO salary vs. a female CEO salary, women have outpaced men in total pay but remained underrepresented in executive positions. Equilar’s study indicates that Lisa Su, the chief executive officer of Advanced Micro Devices, was the highest-paid woman for the second consecutive year and the highest-paid CEO overall in 2020.  Globally, women made up only 5% of the CEOs appointed in 2020. (Heidrick & Struggles) The highest percentage of newly-appointed female CEOs was in Ireland (15%), while the lowest was in Brazil (0%). This is according to a paper that analyzed the backgrounds of chief executives leading 965 of the largest companies in 20 markets around the world. It sought to identify the skills and experience that shaped their path to the top while taking different male vs. female CEO statistics into account.  At the CEO level, men outnumber women by approximately 17 to one.  (Morningstar) According to a study that explored the gender gap in US companies, the number of male executive officers is seven times higher than the number of women holding the same positions. More than 50% of the companies analyzed didn’t have a single female on their lists of executive officers. Jackie Cook, the author of the Morningstar report, found that online retail giant Amazon didn’t have any women among its highest-paid executives as of 2020.  Women who negotiate for raises and promotions are 30% more likely to be considered as "too aggressive" or "intimidating". (Business Insider) Speaking of male managers vs. female managers, statistics reveal that women who don’t negotiate at all are 67% less likely to receive the same negative feedback. The proportion of women in senior management roles increased from 20% in 2011 to 29% in 2020, globally. (Grant Thornton) As 2019 saw a jump of 5% compared to 2018 (amounting to a total of 29%), 2020 represents a leveling off of the progress made during the previous year. This lack of movement doesn’t necessarily reflect a failure of companies to address the existing gender gap. Globally, the proportion of companies with at least one woman in senior management was 87% in 2020.  (Grant Thornton) The number of female CEOs and senior managers has risen by almost 20 percentage points over the last few years. For comparison, this figure stood at 68% in 2015 and 68% in 2017.  77% of women say the biggest obstacle to gender equity in the workplace is the lack of information on how to advance. (Working Mother Research Institute) Only 41% of female survey participants, as opposed to 64% of male respondents, said they have a network of coaches, mentors, and sponsors offering them career guidance. 37% of women versus 64% of men said that their companies provide information on career paths that lead to executive roles. (Working Mother Research Institute) Additionally, women CEO statistics indicate that 74% of female employees understand what the specific requirements are for advancing to the highest-paying roles in their companies even though they don’t receive this type of information directly.  60% of women believe they have the same opportunities to advance as anyone else at their workplace versus 74% of men.  (Working Mother Research Institute) Similarly, 65% of women express they are satisfied with the way their careers are progressing, and so do 78% of men.  Male vs female CEO stats reveal that 59% of male employees aspire to become chief executives versus 40% of women.  (Working Mother Research Institute) Of those women who aspire to become CEOs, 6% are first-level managers (as opposed to 13% of men) and 39% are executives. The same goes for 40% of men hoping to take on the role of chief executive officer.  Businesses with high representations of women in leadership roles had a 35% higher return on equity and 34% higher total shareholder return in comparison with male-dominated companies.  (Catalyst) Female vs male CEO statistics compiled by an NGO during a review of 353 Fortune 500 companies show that the differences were most apparent in facial services, consumer discretionary, and consumer staples industries.
By Milica Milenkovic · September 24,2021

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published.

There are no comments yet