34 Lead Nurturing Statistics to Boost Your Sales

34 Lead Nurturing Statistics to Boost Your Sales
ByJulija A.
December 02,2020

If the most recent lead nurturing statistics are anything to judge by, the digital era has made it impossible to deliver subpar service and stay in business. Unless you already have a well-established brand, missteps with consumers can be deadly. 

That’s why we created this list. Understanding the impact of lead nurturing can help you grow and expand your business. 

Want to know more? 

Keep reading.

Lead Nurturing Statistics—Top Picks

  • 80% of new leads never translate into sales.
  • 96% of visitors who come to your website aren’t ready to buy.
  • Lead nurturing emails get 4-10 more responses than standalone email blasts.
  • 80% of marketers using automation software manage to generate more leads.
  • Organizations that use of marketing automation with prospects experience a 451% increase in qualified leads.

General Lead Generation Statistics

80% of new leads never translate into sales.

(Invespcro)

Most businesses seem to focus solely on lead generation. They want more people to see their products, but they don’t realize that not everyone will be interested in buying them. To get a potential lead to convert, more effort is required than simply showing them something.

65% of businesses say generating traffic and leads is their biggest marketing challenge.

(Hubspot)

Merely finding new leads can be a big challenge, let alone leading a full-blown nurture campaign. To increase traffic to your site, try paying more attention to on-page SEO and have a strong social media presence. Good word about your site will easily spread when you have a large following.

Companies that blog more than 11 times per month get more than 4 times as many leads as those that blog 4-5 times per month.

(Hubspot)

Blogging is another great way to generate more leads on your website. Find professional content writers to manage this for you, and you’re bound to increase your traffic.

96% of visitors who come to your website aren’t ready to buy.

(Marketo)

Not yet, at least. You need to know how to nurture leads if you want to turn these visitors into perspective customers before they bounce.

74% of companies say converting leads into customers is their top priority.

(Hubspot)

Taking a customer from a lead to a genuine conversion is what nurturing is all about. You need to spend some time courting your consumers before they’re ready to make a purchase. More and more companies are beginning to understand this.

Only 29% of brands nurture their existing customers beyond the initial purchase.

(Demand Gen)

Even when you do manage to get a customer to convert, the job isn’t over. Not unless you want to lose them, that is. This lead nurturing statistic shows more brands need to invest their time in keeping their existing customers happy. After all, they are usually the biggest source of steady revenue for a company.

Companies that excel at lead-nurturing generate 50% more sales-ready leads at a 33% lower cost.

(Invespcro)

As you can clearly see, lead nurturing pays off. The most successful businesses that put effort into it see a huge increase in sales and have fewer costs. So, it’s not really just about the momentary advantage and making short-term conversions. It’s about long-term success.

Nurtured leads make 47% larger purchases than non-nurtured leads.

(Invespcro)

Lead nurturing trends show nurtured leads not only make more purchases - they buy bigger, too. Why does this happen? It’s simple. Consumers trust you more. They start liking the company and what it provides, and they’re ready to commit to more things. Any sales pitch works well, and the relationship between the brand and consumer improves.

Outbound leads cost 39% more than inbound leads.

(HubSpot)

At first glance, lead nurturing statistics indicate that inbound leads should be the only thing you focus on. However, inbound leads come to your business on their own, while outbound leads need to be outreached, usually through social media, email marketing, or cold calls. It’s only natural that they would cost more and require more effort. That being said, they are necessary if you want to generate more traffic. The trick here is to find balance and avoid an overly-aggressive, intrusive stance when approaching customers.

Businesses and Lead Generation Statistics

93% of B2B companies say content marketing generates more leads than traditional marketing strategies.

(Marketo)

Content marketing is one of the best ways for brands to engage with customers, and engaged customers always mean more future conversions. Blogs aren’t the only thing you can rely on, either. Videos, social media posts, infographics, e-books, and white papers are just some examples of content that’s interesting to consumers.

(Pinpoint Market Research and Anderson Jones PR)

This B2B generation statistic shows having a wide-spread online presence is the first step to generating conversions. It’s obvious that you need to rank high in Google if you want people to get to your site when they search for a product. But how do you do that? Our suggestion is to invest more in on-page SEO optimization.

68% of B2B companies will use landing pages to nurture new sales leads for future conversion.

(Marketo)

The landing page often introduces consumers to your business, so it must leave a good impression. B2B companies understand the importance of creating a good-looking landing page for an effective lead nurturing campaign.

49% of businesses say most of their leads require “long cycle” nurturing with many influencers.

(Ascend2)

This is especially true for B2B businesses, which generally have longer sales cycles. Sometimes, lead nurturing can take a very long time. To make sure all the effort pays off and results in a conversion, use marketing techniques like email campaigns, which are suitable for long cycles.

51% of email marketers say email list segmentation is the most effective way to personalize lead nurturing.

(Ascend2)

Speaking of emails, here’s a lead nurturing stat that could help you out. Personalization is an important aspect of nurturing leads, and list segmentation could help you achieve it at a higher level. Dividing your contacts into smaller segments based on their interests, location, opt-in frequency, purchase history, or website activity.

34.1% of businesses don’t use any attribution model to measure marketing performance.

(Bizible)

How can you even develop a lead nurturing strategy if you can’t attribute user actions to their place along the sales funnel? You need to measure your performance and figure out how consumers interact with your business in order to plan your next step.

35% of B2B marketers have established a lead nurturing strategy.

(Invespcro)

This is a shockingly small number. Lead nurturing can be particularly fruitful for B2B businesses because the sales process is longer and customers appreciate having the opportunity to build strong bonds with the company.

27% of B2B leads are sales ready when first generated.

(Active Marketing)

This means that more than two-thirds of your leads need to be nurtured. You can do this through an email nurturing campaign, phone calls, text messages, or even face-to-face conversations. Draw your customers in through personal investment and carefully-crafted strategies that will make them feel like they’re making a good decision. Most of them will enjoy being cajoled as long as you do it skillfully. For that to work, you need to figure out what each individual customer needs to do to cross the line and make a purchase.

56% of B2B companies do lead validation before passing the lead to the sales department.

(HubSpot)

When it comes to B2B lead generation, you have to validate leads to avoid overestimating the success of your marketing campaign. To begin with, you should qualify what a good lead looks like for your company. For example, non-sales leads include spam form submissions and spam phone calls, customer service communication, and phone misdials.

In contrast, valid leads result in a genuine interest in your company and an intent to buy. You can rely on tools like Google Analytics to get a clear picture of which companies actually want to do business with you.

53% of marketers say half or more of their budget goes to lead generation.

(BrightTalk)

B2B generation statistics show most businesses are already investing heavily in lead generation. 34% of businesses allocate less than half of their budget to lead generation, and only 14% aren’t sure how much money they spend. 58% intend to increase their lead generation spending in the upcoming year.

Consumer Lead Nurturing Statistics

54% of email marketers say increasing engagement rate is their number one priority.

(Ascend2)

For a lot of people, there are three broad types of email categories: personal, work-related, and brand promotions. The first two are important and likely to be opened, and the last one (which your emails fall under), is often considered spam. Increasing customer engagement through emails can be tough, but there are certain things you can do:

  • Segment your email lists
  • Personalize every single message you send
  • Include CTA buttons
  • Optimize for mobile

Targeting users with content relevant to their position along the sales funnel yields 73% higher conversion rates.

(Aberdeen)

Lead nurturing content statistics show you need to clearly define your consumers’ buying patterns and present them with suitable content. Rely on analytics to understand how buyers go about engaging with your product, then plan out and develop your content accordingly. Don’t get stuck on the awareness stage of the funnel. Follow them through the consideration and decision making stages as well.

59% of marketers agree that creating content is one of the top challenges of lead nurturing strategies.

(Invespcro)

In case you’re wondering how to nurture online leads, content should take first priority. Marketers agree it’s the most challenging part, but it’s absolutely crucial to create valid leads and improve consumer loyalty. So, what’s considered quality content?

Educational videos, interesting blog posts, whitepapers, and generally any kind of subject matter that provides useful information to the consumer and establishes you as an expert in your field. Go for quality over quantity, provide accurate data, and share it on social media to reach your audience.

Lead nurturing emails get 4-10 more responses than standalone email blasts.

(Active Marketing)

Email blasts are no longer among the lead nurturing best practices. To optimize your emails for nurturing, personalize the message behind them through market segmentation and include a useful piece of content your consumers can enjoy. The tone of the email should be friendly and open, and you’ll also need to pay attention to the timing and frequency. Sending emails too often will make you appear like a spammer and turn people away from the brand.

63% of consumers requesting info on your company today will not purchase for at least 3 months.

(Rikvin)

Lead nurturing metrics show converting leads is a long process that requires careful planning. A customer who requests info on your company is usually merely window shopping and trying to determine whether your business is trustworthy. This is particularly true for B2B purchases, and large consumer purchases such as cars, real estate, and home improvement purchases.

45% of marketers don’t know what role mobile marketing has in lead generation.

(Discoverorg)

Despite the hype about mobile marketing, most businesses don’t know how to include it in their lead nurturing tactic. It’s actually straightforward—simply make sure your website and your content can be easily viewed on mobile. As for promotional messages, send short, personalized texts that notify the consumer about upcoming sales or brand deals, and avoid doing it more than once a week.

The number of real estate leads increased by 65% from 2016 to 2017, but the number of conversions dipped by 10%.

(Carrot)

Real estate lead generation statistics can also serve to drive the point home—it’s not enough to get a lead. You have to nurture it if you want an actual conversion. If you focus solely on finding new customers without caring how you approach them, you’re unlikely to get the sales you need to grow your business and generate revenue.

Lead Nurturing and Automation

79% of most successful companies have been using marketing automation for 2 or more years.

(Pardot)

Marketing automation software is the key ingredient in your prize-winning dish. It enables you to automatically manage processes and multifunctional campaigns across multiple channels, reducing the time and effort needed to reach your consumers.

74% of marketers say the biggest benefit of automation is saving time.

(Adestra)

Statistics on lead nurturing indicate that most companies agree on time-saving automation benefits. 68% also think that automation increases customer engagement, and 58% that it enables timely communications. Another 58% claim it increases their opportunities for upselling.

(Active Marketing)

A surprisingly small number of companies use marketing automation to its full potential. Email isn’t the only thing good tools can help you manage. Testing variables, analyzing conversion data, determining ROI, and streamlining other marketing processes are just some of the examples of what it’s useful for.

91% of users believe marketing automation is “very important” to successfully market across multiple channels.

(Marketo)

According to the latest stats, marketing automation lead nurturing is huge. Being able to target different customers across multiple channels is key to getting more valid leads. Catalogs, social media, websites, emails, text messages, and digital ads can all reach a consumer in a different way, but it takes a lot of time to manage so many channels. Fortunately, automation software is your solution.

80% of marketers using automation software manage to generate more leads.

(APSIS)

What’s more, lead nurturing examples show they also convert 77% more leads than before. So, automation isn’t really about laziness - it’s about effectiveness. Creating a multi-channel, data-driven strategy is just the thing you need to stay on top in this competitive market.

58% of best-in-class marketing automation users say the most useful metrics for measuring performance are generated revenue and conversion rate.

(Ascend2)

You can’t optimize your strategy if you don’t know what’s effective. In addition to generated revenue and conversion rate, you can improve your nurture marketing by measuring cost-per-conversion and overall profit.

Organizations that use marketing automation with prospects experience a 451% increase in qualified leads.

(Business 2 Community)

And what’s the end result? A mind-boggling increase in qualified leads. This could be you, and the results could be even better. The initial cost of obtaining the right software will be offset by the increase in revenue, so don’t hesitate when it comes to automation marketing. It’s the right choice for any company that wants to track its progress and get closer to its consumers.

73% of the best-in-class outsource all or part of marketing automation planning.

(The Deep Marketing)

Outsourcing could help you optimize your business to get more customer leads. It can reduce and control costs, maximize external resources, access new markets, and free up internal resources. Outsourcing your automation planning will streamline many time-consuming tasks.

Final Words

Hopefully, our article has inspired you to invest more time in your customers. They will repay the effort by becoming loyal to your brand.

If there’s one thing you take away from these lead nurturing statistics, let it be the fact that each potential lead needs attention if it’s to truly become a conversion. Simply generating leads is costly, and if you end up going nowhere with those customers, it’s just a waste of time and money.

Bottom line:

Invest in automation software to make the process more cost-effective, create a solid strategy, and be ready to experiment and adjust to the shifting trends.

Frequently Asked Questions
What is lead nurturing?

Lead nurturing is the process of building a relationship with your customers along every stage of the sales funnel. It means putting effort into listening to their needs, giving them relevant information that will help them make an informed decision, and generally building trust. Its aim isn’t to generate leads but to turn them into conversions. According to lead nurturing stats, it can be an amazing tool.

It’s a long process that can take months, but it brings outstanding results. People who get in touch with you won’t immediately be ready to make a purchase or hire your company. Through lead nurturing, however, you can ensure they come back and make a commitment to do business with you. What’s more, if you build a relationship based on trust, they’re likely to turn into loyal, recurring customers.

Why lead nurturing is important?

It’s the one thing that will ensure your leads become paying customers. Nurturing cold leads is particularly important because these are the customers that have never had any contact with your business, nor are they actively seeking to get in touch. A few carefully-crafted emails could pique their interest and make sure they remember you. When they do end up needing your services, they’ll know exactly where to look. Even then, lead nurturing won’t be done. You need to cultivate their interest by staying in touch and offering help when they ask for it.

How do you create a lead nurturing campaign?

The importance of lead nurturing is obvious in the conversions it brings, and to begin nurturing, you need a good strategy. Start by defining your audience. Figure out who you want to market to, and then segment that audience into subcategories based on age, gender, purchase habits, or anything else that could help you narrow down individual strategies and deliver a more personalized approach. Once you’ve done that, you can offer your customer something of value instead of immediately jumping into a sales pitch. They’ll pay more attention if you can give before you take from them.

After this, you can start sending emails and making phone calls. Take a look at the email marketing statistics we’ve provided in this article if you need ideas on how to do that. Set up goals you want to accomplish with each email, schedule them to be sent, and then wait. After a while, it’s time to evaluate the outcome and optimize for the future.

About author

Julia A. is a writer at SmallBizGenius.net. With experience in both finance and marketing industries, she enjoys staying up to date with the current economic affairs and writing opinion pieces on the state of small businesses in America. As an avid reader, she spends most of her time poring over history books, fantasy novels, and old classics. Tech, finance, and marketing are her passions, and she’s a frequent contributor at various small business blogs.

More from blog

Victimless crimes without bloody traces, fingerprints, or mysteries worthy of Hercule Poirots’ insights and findings don’t shake the public too much. People don’t usually expect white-collar office workers with their noses buried into piles of papers to keep dark secrets. Despite that, white-collar crime statistics show the seriousness of this problem, which can have devastating consequences on businesses and enterprises.  Money laundering, embezzlement, financial statement frauds, check or payment tampering are among the most common crimes committed by white-collar workers. We compiled data regarding those felonies to help you learn more about white-collar corporate crimes.  White-Collar Crime Stats: Editor’s Choice Only 28% of white-collar employees involved in corporate crimes are women. A typical white-collar felon is a married male in his forties.   White-collar crimes cost the United States over $300 billion per year. Only 6.1% of corporate criminals come from an unhealthy family background. Only 9% of frauds happen in nonprofit organizations. Corruption accounts for 43% of white-collar crimes and causes a median loss of $200,000 per case.  The maximum prison sentence for insider trading in the US is 20 years. White-Collar Crime Demographics: Who Commits the Crimes? Only 28% of white-collar employees involved in corporate crimes are women. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) If there has ever been a need to draw a forensic sketch of a typical corporate criminal for identification purposes, it very likely wouldn’t be a woman. Detailed research into the demographics of white-collar criminals showed that women are very rare corporate crime offenders, accounting for only 27% of committed frauds. The fact that a vast majority are men is understandable given the disproportion of females in higher management positions at corporations. Corporate crime statistics reveal that a typical white-collar felon is a married male in his forties. (Bajoka) (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) The typical white-collar criminal doesn’t look any different than the co-workers you sip your morning coffee with. He is likely in his mid-forties, though some start earlier. He doesn’t have a criminal record and hasn’t committed any criminal acts until his late 30s. Most of them boast at least a Bachelor’s degree and belong to the professions not so often associated with illegal activities: lawyers, financial advisors, accountants, and clergy members. Some companies use employee tracking software to get a better insight into their workforce, but these felons are usually in positions of power, where they don’t get tracked or at least know how to circumvent it.  Statistics of white-collar crime in the US show 35.3% of felons have more than $10,000 in assets. (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) As we can see from the statistics gathered in the research commissioned by The University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice, over a third of white-collar criminals are well-established in the society, with more than $10,000 in assets. 63.5% have residential stability, and out of that number, 50.3% are homeowners. They are usually highly ranked in their companies, often at managerial positions, and 65.8% of them have steady employment.  White-collar crime racial statistics reveal 73.9% of offenders are white. (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) Social and other prejudices often take over the minds of people when they think of criminal activities. Corporate crime is a different beast, though.  Nearly three-quarters of white-collar offenders are white people coming from middle-class or better backgrounds. Notably, income tax frauds are overwhelmingly white-male driven crimes, with 91.4% of perpetrators being male and 89.1% white. Only 6.1% of corporate criminals come from an unhealthy family background. (University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice) When we speak or think about thefts, kidnapping, rape, or murders, we often envision the perpetrators coming from tough financial conditions and unhealthy family backgrounds. Statistics on white-collar crime indicate some often overlooked facts regarding the families the felons come from. Namely, only 6.1% of them were raised in families where they were abused, neglected, or abandoned as children. Only 6% grew up with at least one family member involved in criminal activities, and 15% had parents who struggled to provide the necessities of life. Common Types of White-Collar Crimes Asset misappropriation schemes account for 86% of frauds and cause a median loss of $100,000 per case. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Now that we know who commits white-collar crimes and the statistics behind them, we can determine the most common types of these crimes. According to the data gathered in the Report to the Nations global study on occupational fraud and abuse, the most frequent fraud scheme is asset misappropriation. This felony accounts for 86% of all white-collar crimes, but, luckily, it’s the least costly type with a median loss of $100,000 per case. Asset misappropriation happens when an employee misuses or steals the company’s resources and thus defrauds their employers.  Financial statement frauds are the most costly type of white-collar crime, with a median loss of $954,000. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Luckily, white-collar crime statistics indicate that financial statement fraud schemes are the least common type of corporate fraud, accounting for only 10% of the cases. So what are financial statement frauds? They involve schemes in which the offender intentionally omits or misstatements the material in the company’s financial statements. Corruption accounts for 43% of cases and causes a median loss of $200,000 per case. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Corruption takes up an expectedly high proportion of occupational frauds. Offenses such as bribery, extortion, conflicts of interest, bid-rigging, and other illegal activities cause losses of around $200,000 per case. One of the more alarming facts about white-collar crime is that corruption cases often cost companies more than just money. Often their reputation goes on the line, and many have to reach out to costly reputation management services to mitigate the damage. 64% of organizational offenses in the United States happen in closely-held or private corporations. (United States Sentencing Committee) Speaking of the structure of the organizations where frauds are committed, 64% of them are private or closely-held corporations. US white-collar crime statistics show that limited liability companies account for 22.7% of cases, and 9.3% of cases happen in publicly traded corporations. If we dig deeper into the infrastructure of American businesses committing corporate offenses, we can conclude that most are small in size. Namely, 66.1% had fewer than 50 employees, and only 9.7% had more than 1,000.  Only 9% of frauds happen in nonprofit organizations. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Although nonprofit organizations reported very low white-collar crime rates, the $75,000 in damages per case can be a serious blow to smaller organizations. According to the 2020 Report to the Nations study, private organizations accounted for 44% of corporate frauds, public ones for 26%, government agencies for 16%, and other company types for 6%. General White-Collar Crime Statistics FBI white-collar crime statistics show that these criminal offenses cost the US over $300 billion per year. (Cornell Law School 2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), corporate crime offenses are estimated to cost the US more than $300 billion every year. Aside from fines, other penalties for white-collar crimes include paying the cost of prosecution, home detention, forfeitures, community confinement, supervised release, and even imprisonment.  Only 56% of organizations conducted an investigation of their worst corporate criminal incident. (PwC's Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey 2020) When we look at white-collar crime report statistics, we can see that the main reason for the persistent recurrence of corporate crime might be the lack of people willing to report it. Figures show that only 56% of businesses conducted an investigation of their worst incidents related to white-collar crime. Simultaneously, barely one-third of organizations reported the incident to the board. 89% of the interviewees reported negative emotions after an incident or fraud happened at the company. Taking all the necessary steps to address and better understand the issue results in fewer fraud cases in the future. Ignoring white-collar crime sentencing statistics for a moment, nearly 60% of companies who conducted detailed investigations into the fraud cases ended up being better off for it.  80% of white-collar crime perpetrators received some punishment in 2020, but only 59% of the cases were referred to law enforcement agents. (2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse) Organizations can refer to the corporate criminal incident internally, through civil litigation, or by reaching out to law enforcement. The statistics on the response to frauds indicate that nearly half of the victim organizations (46%) never refer these frauds to law enforcement, believing that internal discipline is sufficient. Another big reason for refraining from reaching out to the criminal justice system is the fear of bad publicity (32%). There were 755 cases of money laundering in the United States in 2020. (United States Sentencing Committee) White-collar crime statistics by the state indicate that the Southern District of Florida had the highest number of money laundering cases during the fiscal year of 2020 (42). This was followed by the Southern Districts of New York and Texas, with 33 convictions each. One of the ways to prevent money laundering and tax evasion is to engage professional tax software solutions to help companies stay up-to-date and compliant with state and federal tax laws. White-collar crime prison statistics reveal that the maximum prison sentence for insider trading in the United States is 20 years. (US Securities and Exchange Commission) Even though not many people and organizations are willing to go to law enforcement in resolving corporate fraud cases, there are exceptions. When reaching out to the criminal justice system to solve the problem, victim organizations can expect the maximum prison sentence for insider trading to be 20 years. At the same time, the maximum amount of money charged from corporate criminals is $5 million for individuals and $25 million for organizations. Obviously, insider trading is just one of the many corporate frauds that can ruin a company’s finances and reputation, but the steep punishments should serve to encourage more people to speak up and get the felons convicted.
By Danica Djokic · October 07,2021
Diversity and inclusion are some of the most important policies that can not only improve the working environment and enhance employee engagement but significantly contribute to all other aspects of any business. The benefits are numerous, and we will discuss them as we unveil some of the most interesting diversity in the workplace statistics. Being a diverse company means hiring people of different ethnicities, gender, age, religion, etc. Companies that have successfully implemented D&I initiatives are often seen as more desirable for employees due to their broader perspective and the positive attitude they cherish. We have done our research, and these are some of the reasons everyone should embrace diversity. Editor’s Choice of Diversity in the Workplace Statistics In 2019, millennials accounted for 35% of the US labor force. Only 8% of CEOs at Fortune 500 companies are female. Diverse companies are 70% more likely to acquire new markets. 46% of Hispanic and 39% of black women earn less than $15 an hour. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fathers who worked remotely were promoted three times more than women in the same position. General Workplace Diversity Data and Stats In 2020, only 17.9% of persons with disabilities were employed in the US. (US Bureau of Labor Statistics) Based on the report published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2020, the unemployment rate for persons with disabilities grew compared to the previous year. In 2019, the percentage of employed persons with disabilities in the US was 19.3. However, those numbers dropped to 17.9 the following year.  Regarding people without disabilities, the report stated 66.3% of them were employed during 2019, but the numbers decreased to 61.8% in 2020. These rates show that there is still much work to be done to overcome the lack of diversity in the workplace, and statistics will need to include more people with disabilities in the workforce going forward. By 2024, it’s expected that 24.8% of the US workforce will be employees older than 55. (Deloitte) It’s not a secret that the US workforce is aging each year. Research on shifting workforce demographics, conducted by Deloitte, suggests that by 2024 employees aged 55+ will make up 24.8% of the workforce. This might not mean much to you, but it is a severe increase if we go back to 1994 when this percentage was significantly lower, or to be precise, 11.9%. The research also projects that the US workforce diversity statistics are about to change and, by 2024, less than two-thirds of the labor force will be defined as “white non-Hispanic.” Back in 1994, over 75% of the labor force fell into that category. In 2019, millennials accounted for 35% of the US labor force. (Pew Research Center) Millennials are all those born between 1981 and 1996, and back in 2019, they accounted for over a third of the US labor force. In 2016, the millennial generation surpassed Generation Xers and became the largest population in the US labor force.  According to research from 2019, Millennials are expected to comprise 75% of the global workforce by 2025.  Gender Diversity in the Workplace Statistics Only 8% of CEOs at Fortune 500 companies are female. (Statista) The gap between male and female leadership roles has always been a thing, and there are multiple statistics to confirm that. However, it looks like things are changing for the better. As Statista confirmed earlier this year, there’s been a new record when it comes to female CEOs. As of June 14, 2021, there were 41 female CEOs employed at Fortune 500 companies. According to the statistics, this wasn’t the only record that got broken. For the first time ever, two black women are running America's 500 highest-grossing companies, giving us hope that gender diversity on executive boards might become a reality in the not-so-distant future. In terms of the median salary in the US, women earn around 18% less than men. (PayScale) The gap between the leadership roles isn’t the only hurdle that women are facing in business nowadays. PayScale, a company that helps employers and employees understand the appropriate pay for every position, reviewed these issues in its Gender Pay Gap Report for 2021. According to this report, women earn only $0.82 for every dollar a man makes. Although it might sound discouraging, this is a slight improvement compared to 2020, when they earned one cent less, as per employment diversity statistics. Also, bear in mind these are uncontrolled pay gap statistics - when doing the same job with the same qualifications, the numbers are less dire: women earn 98 cents for every dollar a man does. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fathers who worked remotely were promoted three times more than women in the same position. (CNBC) The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of the business as we know it. Many had to adapt to the new reality and switch to their home offices instead. According to a CNBC report, 34% of men with children working from home received some kind of promotion during this period.  On the other hand, women’s jobs have been hit much harder by the pandemic. According to an analysis conducted by the National Women’s Law Center, of the 1.1 million workers ages 20 and over, who left the labor force between August and September of 2020, 865,000 were women. Racial and Cultural Diversity in the Workplace Statistics 46% of Hispanic and 39% of black women earn less than $15 an hour. (The Washington Post) In 2019, around 39 million people earned less than $15 per hour. These 39 million employees made about 28% of the workforce at the time, and the majority of the low-wage category consisted of Hispanic and black women. In fact, they were more than 2x as likely as white men to fall into this wage category.  Based on the Washington Post’s research on diversity in the workplace, statistics haven’t really changed since 2019. Roughly 46% of Hispanic women and 39% of Black women still make less than $15 an hour. On the other hand, only 18% of White and Asian men hover around this wage bracket. More than 90% of all Google employees are white or Asian men. (Statista) According to Statista, the distribution of Google employees in the US from 2014 to 2021 does not look very racially or gender-diverse. The data for 2021 shows that white men account for 50.4% of employees, with Asian men following with 42.3%. On the flip side, only 4.4% of the employees are black men and women. If you look at the timeline of these statistics on diversity in the workplace, you will see the Asian population is experiencing steady growth, while the white population dropped from 64.5% in 2014 to 50.4% in 2021.  In 2019, black people held only 3.2% of senior leadership roles in large organizations in the US. (Coqual) “Being Black in Corporate America” is the name of Coqual’s intersectional exploration aimed to show if and how things have changed for the black people in the US during the past few years. The research on the representation of black adults in the US has shown that only 3.2% of black people held senior leadership roles in major companies, with just 0.8% of them being Fortune 500 CEOs. Benefits of Diversity in the Workplace Statistics Diverse companies produce 19% more revenue than those with non-diverse leadership. (Forbes) A study by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), published in 2018, has found that diverse leadership increases the bottom line for companies. According to the study, increasing the diversity of leadership teams can lead to improved financial performance and better innovation. The study included 1,700 companies of all sizes across eight different countries. These findings are important as they show that diversity isn’t just an inclusion metric but an integral part of any successful business. In 2019, gender-diverse companies were 25% more likely to outperform their competitors. (McKinsey) Various diversity in the workplace stats show just how important diversity is and how it can help boost the overall performance of businesses of all sizes. Based on the findings from McKinsey’s research in 2019, companies with gender diversity have 25% higher chances to achieve higher profits than those with less gender diversity on the executive boards. Ethnic diversity in leadership teams is another vital factor. According to the report, companies implementing ethnic and cultural diversity on the executive level have a 36% likelihood of outperforming the competition.  Diverse companies are 70% more likely to acquire new markets. (Harvard Business Review) (Josh Bersin) Establishing a diverse workplace is vital for all modern organizations, and there are many diversity in the workplace statistics that prove this. Diverse companies also have 2.3 times higher cash flow per employee. They are also far better at capturing new markets when compared to the companies that do not practice diversity hiring.  80% of US job candidates look for inclusion when choosing an employer. (Deloitte) Salary and working hours aren't the only deciding factor when it comes to choosing a new employer. Back in 2017, Deloitte published a research paper that surveyed more than 1,300 full-time employees from a range of organizations all across the US. The paper showed just how important diversity and inclusion initiatives are by showing that four-fifths of all employees look for an inclusive workplace. 39% of respondents confirmed they would quit their current job if they found a more inclusive working environment, while 23% indicated they already left a job for that very reason.
By Nikolina Cveticanin · October 04,2021
Women account for 50.8% of the US population, hold 57% of all undergraduate degrees, and approximately 60% of all master’s degrees. And even though they hold about 52% of all management-level jobs, American women cannot keep pace with men in terms of representation when it comes to top leadership roles.  As male vs. female CEO statistics show, it’s the profit and loss roles or P&L responsibilities such as leading a brand, unit, or division, that set executives on the track to becoming a CEO. On the other hand, women who advance into C-suites - the “chief” jobs in companies - typically take on the roles such as head of human resources, legal, or administration. Although all of these functions are extremely important, the line of work they focus on doesn’t involve profit-generating responsibilities, which rarely makes them a path to running a company. Why does the percentage of CEOs that are female remain low in all parts of the world? There isn’t a simple answer to this question. Several studies have shown that it’s the fusion of work-life constraints, early professional trade-offs, and firmly established attitudes towards women in power and the skills and traits that make a good leader that can explain why the careers of equally ambitious and capable men and women often take such different turns. Let’s take a look at some of the most interesting findings. Male vs Female CEO Statistics - Editor’s Choice Female CEOs are running 41 Fortune 500 companies. There are two Black women among the Fortune 500 CEOs. Women made up only 5% of the CEOs appointed in 2020 globally. At the CEO level, men outnumber women by approximately 17 to one.  59% of male employees aspire to become CEOs versus 40% of women. 77% of women say the biggest obstacle to gender equity at the workplace is the lack of information on how to advance. Between 2015 and 2020, the share of women in senior vice president roles in the US increased from 23% to 28%. (McKinsey & Company) Over the same period, the percentage of women in the C-suite went up from 17% to 21%. All women, especially those of color, remained significantly outnumbered in senior management positions. However, prior to the start of the coronavirus pandemic, the representation of female workers in corporate America was slowly trending in the right direction.  According to 2020 statistics on female CEOs in the United States, 21% of C-suite members were women.  (McKinsey & Company)  Based on the survey results published by McKinsey & Company, there’s a leaky pipeline for women in leadership. In 2020, female workers accounted for 47% of entry-level positions, 38% of management roles, and 33% senior management/director roles. Women were entrusted with under one third (29%) of all vice president positions in American organizations. For every 100 men who got promoted to a managerial role, only 85 women advanced to the same position, based on the 2020 data.  (McKinsey & Company) This gap was even larger for women of color as only 71 Latinas, and 58 Black women received a promotion. Consequently, women remained underrepresented at the managerial level holding just 38% of manager positions, while men accounted for 62%. Male vs female CEO statistics from 2020 indicate that 39% of senior-level women burned out compared to 29% of men. (McKinsey & Company) Furthermore, 36% of women felt pressured to work more, in comparison with 27% of men. At the same time, 54% of C-suite women reported that they constantly felt exhausted, and so did 41% of men in similar positions. More than 50% of women in senior leadership roles promote gender and racial equality at work, in comparison with approximately 40% of male top executives. (McKinsey & Company) Women in leadership positions are more likely than men in senior-level roles to take a public stand on racial and gender diversity and champion the advancement of employee-friendly programs and policies. Women CEOs are also more likely to sponsor and mentor other female workers. According to the results of a recent survey, 38% of women in senior-level positions currently mentor or sponsor at least one woman of color, compared to only 23% of men in the same roles.   Female CEOs are running 41 Fortune 500 companies. (Fortune, Statista) In 2021, the number of women appointed to CEO positions in America's 500 highest-grossing companies reached an all-time high. However, the new record still only translates to approximately 8% of female representation at the top of the country's largest public businesses.  On the plus side, the number of women CEOs of Fortune 500 companies almost doubled in comparison with 2018 when there were 24 females leading the nation’s biggest businesses. Calls for diversity and inclusion in the highest echelons of America’s business world are starting to bear fruit as the number of female Fortune 500 chief executive officers increased for the third consecutive year. The top five biggest female-led Fortune 500 businesses as of August 2021 are CVS Health (rank four), Walgreens Boots Alliance (rank 16), General Motors (rank 22), Anthem (rank 23), and Citigroup (rank 33).  Speaking of women in leadership roles, statistics show that there are two Black women among the Fortune 500 CEOs. (Fortune) For the first time, two Black women are running Fortune 500 businesses - Roz Brewer of Walgreens Boots Alliance (rank 16) and Thasunda Brown Duckett of TIAA (rank 79). Before Duckett and Brewer started their new jobs in 2021, only one Black woman - Ursula Burns, former Xerox chief - had ever been appointed CEO at a Fortune 500 business on a permanent basis. After Burnes stepped down from the role in 2017, and, with the exception of Bed Bath & Beyond's Mary Winston, who worked as interim chief for a few months in 2019, Black female chief executive officers have been missing from the Fortune 500 list ever since. Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser is the first woman to run a major Wall Street bank. (Fortune) Fraser’s appointment marked huge progress for the financial industry. Much like Dick's Sporting Goods chief Lauren Hobart, Clorox chief Linda Rendle, new Coty CEO Sue Nabi, Walgreens Boots Alliance’s Roz Brewer, Thasunda Brown Duckett of TIAA, and CVS’s CEO Karen Lynch, Fraser took over from a male CEO. Statistics on Fortune 500 CEOs by gender reveal that there were only 37 female and 463 male chiefs leading America’s highest earning businesses in 2000. (Fortune) The number of women in CEO positions in the Fortune 500 hasn’t been growing steadily throughout the last two decades. There were 24 female chiefs in 2015, 21 women CEOs in 2016, and 32 women running Fortune 500 businesses in 2017, while that number dropped to 24 in 2018.  At the median, 16 female CEOs earned $13.6 million in 2020, in comparison to $12.6 million for the 326 men included in a study. (Equilar) According to a study published in May 2021 comparing a male CEO salary vs. a female CEO salary, women have outpaced men in total pay but remained underrepresented in executive positions. Equilar’s study indicates that Lisa Su, the chief executive officer of Advanced Micro Devices, was the highest-paid woman for the second consecutive year and the highest-paid CEO overall in 2020.  Globally, women made up only 5% of the CEOs appointed in 2020. (Heidrick & Struggles) The highest percentage of newly-appointed female CEOs was in Ireland (15%), while the lowest was in Brazil (0%). This is according to a paper that analyzed the backgrounds of chief executives leading 965 of the largest companies in 20 markets around the world. It sought to identify the skills and experience that shaped their path to the top while taking different male vs. female CEO statistics into account.  At the CEO level, men outnumber women by approximately 17 to one.  (Morningstar) According to a study that explored the gender gap in US companies, the number of male executive officers is seven times higher than the number of women holding the same positions. More than 50% of the companies analyzed didn’t have a single female on their lists of executive officers. Jackie Cook, the author of the Morningstar report, found that online retail giant Amazon didn’t have any women among its highest-paid executives as of 2020.  Women who negotiate for raises and promotions are 30% more likely to be considered as "too aggressive" or "intimidating". (Business Insider) Speaking of male managers vs. female managers, statistics reveal that women who don’t negotiate at all are 67% less likely to receive the same negative feedback. The proportion of women in senior management roles increased from 20% in 2011 to 29% in 2020, globally. (Grant Thornton) As 2019 saw a jump of 5% compared to 2018 (amounting to a total of 29%), 2020 represents a leveling off of the progress made during the previous year. This lack of movement doesn’t necessarily reflect a failure of companies to address the existing gender gap. Globally, the proportion of companies with at least one woman in senior management was 87% in 2020.  (Grant Thornton) The number of female CEOs and senior managers has risen by almost 20 percentage points over the last few years. For comparison, this figure stood at 68% in 2015 and 68% in 2017.  77% of women say the biggest obstacle to gender equity in the workplace is the lack of information on how to advance. (Working Mother Research Institute) Only 41% of female survey participants, as opposed to 64% of male respondents, said they have a network of coaches, mentors, and sponsors offering them career guidance. 37% of women versus 64% of men said that their companies provide information on career paths that lead to executive roles. (Working Mother Research Institute) Additionally, women CEO statistics indicate that 74% of female employees understand what the specific requirements are for advancing to the highest-paying roles in their companies even though they don’t receive this type of information directly.  60% of women believe they have the same opportunities to advance as anyone else at their workplace versus 74% of men.  (Working Mother Research Institute) Similarly, 65% of women express they are satisfied with the way their careers are progressing, and so do 78% of men.  Male vs female CEO stats reveal that 59% of male employees aspire to become chief executives versus 40% of women.  (Working Mother Research Institute) Of those women who aspire to become CEOs, 6% are first-level managers (as opposed to 13% of men) and 39% are executives. The same goes for 40% of men hoping to take on the role of chief executive officer.  Businesses with high representations of women in leadership roles had a 35% higher return on equity and 34% higher total shareholder return in comparison with male-dominated companies.  (Catalyst) Female vs male CEO statistics compiled by an NGO during a review of 353 Fortune 500 companies show that the differences were most apparent in facial services, consumer discretionary, and consumer staples industries.
By Milica Milenkovic · September 24,2021

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published.


There are no comments yet