Google Walkout Leader Meredith Whittaker Leaves the Company

Ivana V. Image
ByIvana V.
July 17,2019

Meredith Whittaker, the Google employee who helped lead the protests against the tech giant’s involvement with the military, its handling of AI ethics, and its sexual harassment policies, has left the company.

The news of Whittaker’s departure from the company was first reported by Bloomberg after Google’s Software Engineer Chris Lu tweeted about it yesterday. Without providing additional comments, Google confirmed to TechCrunch that she had left the organization.

“Today is @mer__edith's final day at Google. Watching her experience as a whistleblower at Google and a victim of retaliation cannot signal good things for how AI institutions will react to negative criticism. #NotOkGoogle” Lu posted on Monday.

Whittaker was a program manager at Google, co-founder of the AI Now Institute, an ethics committee affiliated with New York University, and the founder of Google’s Open Research Group, which focuses on AI development.

While employed by the search engine company, she was a vocal advocate for change and spoke out publically every time she felt ethical boundaries were being crossed.

Last year when word got out that Google was collaborating with the Department of Defense on the controversial Project Maven, helping it develop AI tools to analyze drone footage, Whittaker spoke up about it, condemning such practices.

This led to a few employees leaving the company and incited a very negative public reaction. In response to these events, the tech firm published its AI Principles in June 2018 which prevented it from renewing its $10 billion contract with the Pentagon.

Whittaker also pushed back in November 2018 when it was revealed that, despite credible sexual harassment allegations, Android co-creator Andy Rubin had received a $90 million payout package from Google.

The event sparked a much broader conversation about the way the company handles sexual harassment allegations. Together with her co-worker Claire Stapleton, Whittaker helped organize last year’s “Google Walkout for Change”, in which 20,000 employees worldwide took part.

Even though following the protests Google had ended its practice of forced arbitration for sexual harassment and assault cases, which required employees to waive their legal rights, Stapleton and Whittaker fell victims of retaliation.

Stapleton was the first to quit, in April 2019. In a post explaining her decision to leave Google, she wrote “I made the choice after the heads of my department branded me with a kind of scarlet letter that makes it difficult to do my job or find another one. If I stayed, I didn’t just worry that there’d be more public flogging, shunning, and stress, I expected it.”

After Stapelton's departure, Whittaker once again spoke her mind about the way Google intimidates those who try to openly discuss the dark side of power associated with big tech. She tweeted “Google's retaliation isn't about me, or @clairewaves. It's about silencing dissent & making us afraid to speak honestly about tech & power. NOT OK. Now more than ever, it's time to speak up.”

Whittaker could not be reached for comments at this time.

About the author

Ivana is a staff writer at SmallBizGenius. Her interests during office hours include writing about small businesses, start-ups, and retail. When the weekend comes, you can find her hiking in nature, hanging off of a cliff or dancing salsa.

More from news

Barclays has announced Monday that it is halting the sale of new retail structured products as it continues to be investigated by regulators over a $15bn trading error. The famous business-oriented bank now faces regulatory scrutiny over its trading slip-up from 2019 that’s only recently been discovered. The bank will have to pay investors over £450m in reparations, and one of the largest shareholders has already sold double that amount in the bank’s shares. Barclays’ clerical error will also force the bank to buy back affected securities at their original price. According to the law, all providers of structured products must register their shelves with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Barclays used to have a license that allowed its shelf to automatically increase the more items it issued, but this was changed following the trading debacle. Not realizing the error for years, the bank had continued to operate as if its shelf would automatically rise, which resulted in it exceeding its pre-set limit of $20.8bn by $15.2bn. Barclays immediately stopped issuing new shares, but the damage to its finances and reputation was already done. This is certainly not the news that investors wanted to hear from Barclays, especially as the lender is already under a great deal of scrutiny from regulators. It remains to be seen what the outcome of the investigation will be, but Barclays will likely face a substantial fine in addition to the other costs it will have to pay. It’s not the first time Barclays has been under fire for its trading practices. In 2012, it was fined $450 million by US and UK authorities for manipulating Libor rates. This will be a much costlier blunder, though, and the full extent of the costs may not be visible for quite some time.
By Vladana Donevski · April 07,2022
The eCommerce sales boom of the past two years, for both retail and wholesale platforms, has impacted practically all companies with an online presence - Nike included. The sports apparel giant has seen strong demand from North America lately, with its share price rising by 5% and its fiscal third-quarter results topping all analysts’ estimates. These results are promising, but Nike still did not give a full-year forecast because of the uncertainties caused by inflation, war, and obstructed supply chains. The situation with China also remains unclear, as many Chinese consumers continue to boycott Western brands, including Nike. The Chief Financial Officer at Nike, Matthew Friend, commented on these uncertainties: “We are focused on what we can control. There are several new dynamics creating higher levels of volatility.” As supply chains got disrupted during the pandemic, Nike prioritized some markets over others, allocating more products to North America, as its biggest market. Despite these challenges, Nike’s sales grew by 9% in its third quarter. However, sales in Greater China decreased by 5% compared to the previous year. It is clear that the pandemic has significantly impacted Nike’s business: The company has had to adapt to new challenges and uncertainties. But thanks to strong demand from North America, it has been able to weather the storm and continue growing. Despite all the challenges, Nike’s sales results topped all analysts’ estimates. It reported a net income of $1.4 billion for the three months ending on February 28. Its sales rose to $10.87 billion from $10.36 billion the previous year. “Nike’s strong results this quarter show that our Consumer Direct Acceleration strategy is working as we invest to achieve our growth opportunities. Fuelled by deep consumer connections, compelling product innovation, and an expanding digital advantage, we have the right playbook to navigate volatility and create value through our relentless drive to serve the future of sport,” said John Donahoe, Nike’s CEO. As things stand, Nike is likely to keep its spot among the top activewear retailers; however, the effect ongoing inflation will have on its shoppers remains to be seen.
By Danica Jovic · March 25,2022
According to data compiled by PYMNTS.com, Amazon’s market share of eCommerce sales in the United States hit a record-high of 56.7% in 2021.  The figures mark a significant increase from the company’s 46.1% market share in 2019, which underscores the pandemic-fuelled shift in spending to digital channels and Amazon’s dominance of the online retail market. What’s more, this number may be even higher as it does not take into account third-party sellers that use Amazon as a marketplace to sell their products.  With such a large portion of the market, it’s no wonder that other retailers have been struggling to keep up. Walmart, for example, has seen its market share rise by nearly 50% since 2020, but that translates into only 6.2% of the market by the end of 2021. This is significantly lower than Amazon, despite Walmart's 5,000 physical store locations across the US.  Amazon is also closing in on Walmart's dominance of the food and beverage market, albeit slowly. However, Amazon reigns supreme in sectors such as Clothing and Apparel, Sporting Goods, Hobby, Music and Books, and Furniture and Home Furnishings. On a number of fronts, Amazon's eCommerce edge is significant. With its share of total US retail sales (both online and in-store) growing to 9.4% versus Walmart's 8.6%, it has now moved ahead for the first time due to its increased market presence and by offering more options to customers. Walmart is responding to the fierce competition from Amazon by announcing changes to its business model.  “Our stores have become hybrid. They're both stores and fulfillment centers,” said Walmart CEO Doug McMillion. “Having inventory so close to so many customers is a competitive advantage.”  The latest data shows that Amazon is still growing and expanding its reach within the eCommerce platforms. It will be interesting to see how these numbers change in the coming years as retailers continue to struggle while Amazon’s market share surges.
By Julija A. · March 18,2022

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published.


There are no comments yet